EVABOOT ALTERNATIVES
8 Evaboot alternatives worth considering in 2026
Evaboot does a focused job well: export LinkedIn Sales Navigator leads, clean the data, check whether leads match the search filters, and optionally find professional emails.
But it isn't the right tool for every workflow.
You may want lower extraction costs, phone numbers, more automation, a proprietary prospect database, deeper company research, or a workflow that continues beyond the CSV.
We compared eight alternatives based on what you actually want to do after building the Sales Navigator search.
THE SHORT VERSION
Which Evaboot alternative should you choose?
| Tool | Best for |
|---|---|
| Zilvo | Low-cost Sales Navigator extraction + verification + deeper ICP qualification |
| Scrupp | LinkedIn extraction with email and phone enrichment |
| PhantomBuster | Multi-platform scraping and automation |
| Wiza | B2B contact data and enrichment |
| Apollo | Prospect database + sales engagement |
| Clay | Multi-source enrichment and GTM workflows |
| Waalaxy | LinkedIn + email outreach automation |
| Captain Data | Complex automated data workflows |
If your requirement is simply:
"Sales Navigator → clean CSV → professional emails"
Evaboot itself remains a solid option.
If the reason you are looking for an alternative is cost, enrichment, automation or deeper qualification, that's where the tools below start to diverge.
CONTEXT
Why do people look for Evaboot alternatives?
Evaboot is intentionally narrow.
It works with LinkedIn Sales Navigator, charges credits for exports and email finding, and uses a subscription model. One exported lead or account costs one credit; finding an email costs another credit when an email is successfully found.
That works well for some teams.
Others eventually need something different:
Lower extraction costs
Large Sales Navigator exports can make per-record economics important.
Phone numbers
Evaboot's contact-enrichment workflow focuses on professional email rather than phones.
Broader data sources
Some teams also want standard LinkedIn, Apollo, databases or other web sources.
Automation
Others need the data to flow into outreach, CRM or automated workflows.
Deeper qualification
A Sales Navigator filter can tell you employee size and industry. It cannot always tell you what a company really sells or whether it fits a custom ICP.
That's why there isn't one universal Evaboot replacement.
1. Zilvo
Best for: low-cost Sales Navigator extraction + qualification
Zilvo is the closest alternative if you like Evaboot's core idea — Sales Navigator extraction plus filter verification — but want much lower extraction costs and a deeper company-research workflow afterwards.
Both products recognize an important problem:
Sales Navigator can return people who do not cleanly satisfy the filters used to build the search.
Evaboot re-checks exported leads and provides mismatch reasons.
Zilvo does the same fundamental job, but its verification is explicitly built around the person's current employment.
One employment must satisfy the entire search.
Suppose your filters are:
Someone might be:
Business Head at a 20-person company
and simultaneously:
Co-Founder of a 5-person company.
The title matches somewhere. The company size matches somewhere.
But no individual employment satisfies both.
Zilvo returns
Zilvo does not combine those attributes into a false match, and it provides the reason behind each outcome.
Where Zilvo differs most: price
Evaboot's entry plan starts at $9 for 100 monthly credits. Its plans scale as monthly subscriptions. Zilvo uses one-time packs:
| Zilvo pack | Credits | Price | Cost per export |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | 2,500 credits | $10 | $0.004/export |
| Standard | 6,000 credits | $20 | $0.0033/export |
| Premium | 20,000 credits | $50 | $0.0025/export |
22.5x
At Evaboot's entry rate of $0.09/export, Zilvo Basic's extraction cost is about 22.5x lower. This is the entry-plan comparison only — larger Evaboot plans carry different per-credit economics.
What happens after verification?
This is the other major difference.
An extracted company can be sent into Zilvo Company Analyze.
So Zilvo separates Sales Navigator fit from ICP fit.
Sales Navigator tells you
- Software company
- 11–50 employees
- United States
Company Analyze can help answer
- Does it actually sell SaaS?
- Product or service?
- Who does it sell to?
- What does it offer?
- Does it fit our custom ICP?
Where Zilvo is weaker
Zilvo currently does not find emails or phone numbers.
It also does not yet have the API/integration ecosystem Evaboot has built.
Choose Zilvo if: extraction cost, targeting quality and company qualification matter more than built-in contact enrichment.
2. Scrupp
Best for: extraction + email + phone enrichment
Scrupp is one of the closest alternatives if you want more contact data than Evaboot provides.
It supports:
Scrupp currently offers subscriptions starting at $29/month for 1,000 credits and one-time packs starting at $35 for 1,000 credits. Its one-time credits do not expire.
That makes it broader than either Evaboot or Zilvo.
Scrupp vs Evaboot
Choose Scrupp if you want
- phone numbers
- several scraping sources
- email + phone enrichment
- API-based workflows
- one-time credits
Choose Evaboot if
you want a narrower, straightforward Sales Navigator export-and-cleaning workflow.
Choose Zilvo instead if
your priority is much cheaper raw extraction plus post-extraction targeting verification and company analysis.
Full Zilvo vs Scrupp comparison3. PhantomBuster
Best for: scraping + automation across multiple platforms
PhantomBuster solves a substantially bigger problem than Evaboot.
A Phantom can extract information, enrich leads, automate workflows and perform other actions across LinkedIn and other platforms.
Its current plans are based primarily around execution time, automation slots and credits, rather than simply charging per exported Sales Navigator lead. The Start plan is currently shown at $56/month when billed annually.
This makes PhantomBuster much more flexible. It also makes it more complex.
PhantomBuster vs Evaboot
Use Evaboot if you want
Sales Navigator → clean export
Use PhantomBuster if you want
Scrape → enrich → automate → schedule → connect workflows
If all you need is a Sales Navigator CSV, PhantomBuster can be more machinery than you need.
If your automation requirements extend well beyond Sales Navigator, Evaboot may feel too narrow.
4. Wiza
Best for: contact and company enrichment
Wiza used to be one of the closest Sales Navigator exporters to Evaboot.
That changed on August 19, 2026.
Wiza removed bulk export and list creation directly from LinkedIn, Sales Navigator and Recruiter search/list pages. Users now build bulk lists using Wiza Prospect, CSV uploads or CRM imports instead.
That makes Wiza a very different Evaboot alternative today. Its strength is now its own data/enrichment workflow.
Wiza can provide professional information, company data, funding information, verified work emails and, on higher enrichment levels, phone numbers and personal emails.
Wiza vs Evaboot
Choose Evaboot if your starting point needs to remain a Sales Navigator search export.
Choose Wiza if you are comfortable building the audience through Wiza Prospect or another source and your priority is contact enrichment.
5. Apollo
Best for: replacing scraping with a prospect database
Apollo approaches the problem from the opposite direction.
Instead of building the audience in Sales Navigator and extracting it, you search Apollo's own B2B database.
That can be appealing if you want:
inside one system.
The trade-off is straightforward.
Evaboot
starts with live Sales Navigator searches.
Apollo
starts with Apollo's database.
Those are fundamentally different sourcing models.
Choose Apollo if: you want a prospecting database and outbound system rather than primarily a LinkedIn scraper.
6. Clay
Best for: enrichment workflows
Clay isn't really an Evaboot clone.
It becomes relevant when the challenge is no longer:
"How do I get these Sales Navigator records into a spreadsheet?"
but:
"How do I enrich and classify these records using multiple data sources?"
Clay is built around enrichment workflows, data providers and flexible GTM operations.
It can be extremely powerful. But if all you need is inexpensive Sales Navigator extraction, using Clay as the centre of that workflow may be unnecessary.
Choose Clay if: enrichment logic and combining multiple data sources are more important than the scraper itself.
7. Waalaxy
Best for: turning LinkedIn lists into outreach campaigns
Waalaxy sits further downstream.
Its focus is LinkedIn prospecting and outreach:
Current plans start at €19/user/month, with the Business tier adding LinkedIn + email campaigns and email-finder credits.
Waalaxy vs Evaboot
Evaboot helps create the list.
Waalaxy is more focused on what you do with the list afterwards.
If the missing part of your stack is outreach rather than extraction, Waalaxy makes more sense.
8. Captain Data
Best for: automated data pipelines
Captain Data is aimed more at teams building automated prospecting and data workflows than someone who wants a simple browser export.
It belongs in the comparison because teams sometimes outgrow manual exports and need:
That flexibility usually comes with more setup and a very different buying decision from Evaboot.
Choose Captain Data if: you need an automated data pipeline rather than primarily a Chrome-based Sales Navigator scraper.
USE-CASE MATRIX
Compare the alternatives by use case
| Need | Tool to consider |
|---|---|
| Cheapest Sales Navigator extraction | Zilvo |
| Sales Nav extraction + filter verification | Zilvo / Evaboot |
| Deeper ICP/company qualification | Zilvo |
| Email + phone enrichment | Scrupp / Wiza |
| Multi-platform automation | PhantomBuster |
| Prospect database | Apollo |
| Multi-source enrichment | Clay |
| LinkedIn outreach automation | Waalaxy |
| Data pipelines | Captain Data |
| Simple clean Sales Nav export + email | Evaboot |
When should you stay with Evaboot?
Not every search for an alternative means you should switch.
Evaboot is still a sensible choice when:
- you already use Sales Navigator heavily,
- you want an uncomplicated export workflow,
- you value its cleaning and filter checking,
- you want professional emails in the same product,
- and the subscription/credit economics work at your volume.
Its narrowness can actually be an advantage.
You don't have to build a complicated GTM workflow just to export a list.
When does Zilvo make more sense?
Zilvo becomes particularly interesting when two things are true.
1. You're exporting at meaningful volume.
At $0.004 per record on Zilvo Basic versus $0.09 at Evaboot's entry-plan rate, the difference gets large quickly. For 2,500 exported records:
Zilvo Basic
$10
Evaboot starter per-credit rate
$225
Important note: Evaboot has larger plans with different economics, so this is not a claim that every 2,500-lead Evaboot export costs $225. It's simply the entry-rate comparison.
2. Sales Navigator filters aren't your whole ICP.
If you need to know not just:
"Does this company fit the LinkedIn filters?"
but:
"Is this genuinely the kind of company we sell to?"
Company Analyze adds that second layer.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
LOOKING FOR A LOWER-COST SALES NAVIGATOR WORKFLOW?
Start with 500 Zilvo credits.
Extract your Sales Navigator search, verify which leads genuinely match, and take companies deeper when your ICP requires more than LinkedIn filters.